So were all saying Facebook is a flash in the pan and we will get bored. I have even defended Facebook, saying the ‘people’ will keep it alive.
Facebook will implode…
Tonight I set myself a goal of going through all my facebook groups (only 26) and either responding to a discussion topic, writing something on the group wall or deleting it so I don’t waste my time reading fluff.
Over three hours I ended up in some good conversations that were relevant to my new business and was sorting out some really useful conceptual problems around social networking, investment and business process etc. ALL THIS WITH THE HELP OF REAL PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REAL TIME.
Doing this alerted me to a fatal flaw in the design of facebook.
Think about my permutations. I have 26 groups, an average of 5 discussion topics on each. Web2.0 (Entrepreneurs) has 179 discussion topics (My average was wrong!). I responded to a couple here and there. Jeez it was fun, but…
I go to bed and when I get up tomorrow I probably won’t remember where that really cool discussion topic about social networks in developing countries was. I’ll search through the 3 likely groups and finally find it. Not only will I find my interesting stuff there but I’ll also find that 10 other people had also written on it - And I would have been none the wiser! I might have missed out on all that additional creative thinking… What if.
Discussions happen everywhere on facebook. Web 2.0 (Entrepreneurs) has 514 posts on its wall. What about your ‘wall’, your ‘notes’, you friends’ ‘wall’, their ‘notes’, other group ‘walls’ on the group ‘discussion board’ to name but a few. How can we possibly manage this massive distributed mess of ‘fresh and alive’ information.
It’s less important when you are chatting with your friends and linking up to people or playing with silly applications. However, if you are generating knowledge or doing research this task is mammoth!
How can we solve this? Help!!
What about RSS?
Talking with Leisa Reichelt (on my ‘notes’) tonight, she suggested that RSS would solve the problem. But that’s only the half of it! You’d need a good RSS ‘Manager’ like Netvibes to help you make sense of the screeds of content. I’m sure that was an assumption Leisa made
But still, it’s not going to solve the problem.
What about search?
You certainly would find it hard to quickly browse for what you want in the groups on Web 2.0 (Entrepreneurs). The order of the topics changes. Every time one is updated it goes to the top of the list! Great for hearing your own VOICE but not for organising information so you can find it again.
You can’t search within groups at all, let alone discussions? Full stop.
What about listing people’s comments on their profile somehow?
So much data…and it is only growing exponentially. Hard work.
Just see the Facebook article Australian Financial Review yesterday, called ‘Power in charting human relationships’ . This thing is growing so fast - and how long have we all been contributing here.. a couple of months??
This mess is just another case of poor planning. They just didn’t think through how people might leverage this platform and how much information would be created. Most importantly that people might like to find that information AGAIN!
So facebook has drawn us all in with a highly usable, fast and easy login process and easy way of finding and inviting friends. Where does that leave us now? Fighting against screeds of information in this new found world and striving to share and create knowledge. Or going back into our hermit introspective lives where MySpace was too hard to be bothered with.
Maybe we’ll be RSS’ing out facebook discussions back out to our blogs for easy storage? I am certainly going to start cutting and pasting important ones onto my blog.